https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182783 Anti-terror legislation may still apply, and the investigation period may be extended, even if an organisation has not yet been formally declared unlawful at the time of arrest. The absence of such notification does not by itself exclude alleged terrorist activity or the accused's knowledge of it. The Supreme Court treated the special statutory scheme as sufficient to uphold the Special Court's jurisdiction to extend investigation time and reject statutory bail. It also regarded recovery of cash from the accused as a circumstance warranting further investigation, with the available material insufficient to justify interference or bail at that stage. en-us Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 May 2016 15:30:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182783 Anti-terror legislation may still apply, and the investigation period may be extended, even if an organisation has not yet been formally declared unlawful at the time of arrest. The absence of such notification does not by itself exclude alleged terrorist activity or the accused's knowledge of it. The Supreme Court treated the special statutory scheme as sufficient to uphold the Special Court's jurisdiction to extend investigation time and reject statutory bail. It also regarded recovery of cash from the accused as a circumstance warranting further investigation, with the available material insufficient to justify interference or bail at that stage. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182783