<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1224 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182781</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessees against the order revoking exemption under section 10(10C) on ex-gratia amount received under the Exit Option Scheme by State Bank of India. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to allow the exemption was correct and not erroneous, emphasizing that the CIT&#039;s directive issued after assessments were completed was not justified. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the CIT&#039;s orders, ruling in favor of the assessees on 7th December 2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 14:56:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1224 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182781</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessees against the order revoking exemption under section 10(10C) on ex-gratia amount received under the Exit Option Scheme by State Bank of India. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to allow the exemption was correct and not erroneous, emphasizing that the CIT&#039;s directive issued after assessments were completed was not justified. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the CIT&#039;s orders, ruling in favor of the assessees on 7th December 2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>