<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 766 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327785</link>
    <description>Section 68 requires the assessee to establish the identity of the lender, creditworthiness and genuineness of the transaction. In this ITAT Mumbai discussion, unsecured loans received from minor children were supported by bank statements, RBI bond maturity details and disclosure certificates showing that disclosed funds were invested in RBI bonds, matured, and were then advanced to the assessee. On those facts, the immediate source and movement of funds were sufficiently explained, and the credits could not be treated as unexplained merely because the explanation was not accepted at assessment stage. The additions under section 68 were therefore deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 10:24:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 766 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327785</link>
      <description>Section 68 requires the assessee to establish the identity of the lender, creditworthiness and genuineness of the transaction. In this ITAT Mumbai discussion, unsecured loans received from minor children were supported by bank statements, RBI bond maturity details and disclosure certificates showing that disclosed funds were invested in RBI bonds, matured, and were then advanced to the assessee. On those facts, the immediate source and movement of funds were sufficiently explained, and the credits could not be treated as unexplained merely because the explanation was not accepted at assessment stage. The additions under section 68 were therefore deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>