<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 756 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327775</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, finding explanations satisfactory regarding unexplained cash deposits, sale of gold, and cash movements. The Tribunal held that additions made by the Assessing Officer were unjustified, allowing the Assessee&#039;s appeal and deleting the additional income imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 10:23:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 756 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327775</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, finding explanations satisfactory regarding unexplained cash deposits, sale of gold, and cash movements. The Tribunal held that additions made by the Assessing Officer were unjustified, allowing the Assessee&#039;s appeal and deleting the additional income imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>