<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 755 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327774</link>
    <description>The ITAT held that the CIT(A) should have directed the AO to verify if the payees included the receipts in their returns and paid taxes. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside, and the issue was remanded to the AO for verification. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the stay application was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2023 18:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 755 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327774</link>
      <description>The ITAT held that the CIT(A) should have directed the AO to verify if the payees included the receipts in their returns and paid taxes. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside, and the issue was remanded to the AO for verification. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the stay application was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>