<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1283 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182746</link>
    <description>The court set aside the order refusing rectification under Section 74(2) of the Finance Act, 1994, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner&#039;s application on its merits. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to rectify the alleged typographical error in the service tax amount within eight weeks. The writ petition was allowed, and pending petitions were closed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 08:03:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1283 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182746</link>
      <description>The court set aside the order refusing rectification under Section 74(2) of the Finance Act, 1994, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner&#039;s application on its merits. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to rectify the alleged typographical error in the service tax amount within eight weeks. The writ petition was allowed, and pending petitions were closed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>