<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1196 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182748</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by M/s Jubilant Biosys Limited (JBL) regarding refund claims under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 were allowed. The Tribunal emphasized the broad interpretation of &quot;input service&quot; and the necessity of services for business operations, granting JBL the refund benefits. Additionally, an appeal contesting the rejection of refund claims on the grounds of time-bar was remanded for further adjudication. Appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 15:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1196 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182748</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by M/s Jubilant Biosys Limited (JBL) regarding refund claims under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 were allowed. The Tribunal emphasized the broad interpretation of &quot;input service&quot; and the necessity of services for business operations, granting JBL the refund benefits. Additionally, an appeal contesting the rejection of refund claims on the grounds of time-bar was remanded for further adjudication. Appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>