https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182751 The Tribunal ruled that the applicant must deposit service tax liability on incentives received, emphasizing the need to analyze the purpose of incentives for tax determination. Despite citing a precedent for non-taxable incentives, the Tribunal required a partial deposit of Rs. 12,00,000 within eight weeks, pending appeal, as a complete waiver was not justified. This case underscores the importance of scrutinizing incentive nature for tax implications and showcases the Tribunal's balanced approach in tax disputes, considering compliance and relief pending appeal. en-us Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 May 2016 08:03:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182751 The Tribunal ruled that the applicant must deposit service tax liability on incentives received, emphasizing the need to analyze the purpose of incentives for tax determination. Despite citing a precedent for non-taxable incentives, the Tribunal required a partial deposit of Rs. 12,00,000 within eight weeks, pending appeal, as a complete waiver was not justified. This case underscores the importance of scrutinizing incentive nature for tax implications and showcases the Tribunal's balanced approach in tax disputes, considering compliance and relief pending appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182751