<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1111 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182752</link>
    <description>The tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the appellant&#039;s right to challenge liability, interest, or penalty after payment. The judgment emphasized the difference between Settlement Commission and adjudicating authority decisions, clarifying that payment does not automatically settle the matter unless specified by law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 08:03:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1111 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182752</link>
      <description>The tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the appellant&#039;s right to challenge liability, interest, or penalty after payment. The judgment emphasized the difference between Settlement Commission and adjudicating authority decisions, clarifying that payment does not automatically settle the matter unless specified by law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>