<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1197 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182755</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the payment of Rs. 3,63,21,635/- could not be treated as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act and directed the assessing officer to delete this addition. The other issues were remitted back for fresh consideration, with directions for reassessment. The appeal was partly allowed, with specific components to be reassessed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 08:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1197 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182755</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the payment of Rs. 3,63,21,635/- could not be treated as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act and directed the assessing officer to delete this addition. The other issues were remitted back for fresh consideration, with directions for reassessment. The appeal was partly allowed, with specific components to be reassessed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>