<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 748 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327767</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal and Order-in-Original, confirming the service tax demand along with interest and penalties. The appeal was dismissed, and the tribunal found no merit in the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the classification of services, applicability of service tax, limitation period, and imposition of penalties. The tribunal&#039;s decision was based on a detailed examination of the tripartite agreements and the nature of the services provided, which clearly constituted advertising services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 748 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327767</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal and Order-in-Original, confirming the service tax demand along with interest and penalties. The appeal was dismissed, and the tribunal found no merit in the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the classification of services, applicability of service tax, limitation period, and imposition of penalties. The tribunal&#039;s decision was based on a detailed examination of the tripartite agreements and the nature of the services provided, which clearly constituted advertising services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>