<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 747 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327766</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the services provided by the appellant did not fall within the definition of Business Auxiliary Service under the Finance Act, 1994. Consequently, the Tribunal granted a full waiver of pre-deposit and stayed all further proceedings for the recovery of the assessed liability until the appeal is disposed of, providing relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 22:46:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 747 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327766</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the services provided by the appellant did not fall within the definition of Business Auxiliary Service under the Finance Act, 1994. Consequently, the Tribunal granted a full waiver of pre-deposit and stayed all further proceedings for the recovery of the assessed liability until the appeal is disposed of, providing relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>