<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 29 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3518</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal regarding the demand of interest by the Revenue on delayed payment of duty under Section 47 of the Customs Act. The Court found no legal error in the Tribunal&#039;s ruling, stating that the duty payment was made promptly within two days of assessment, despite the delayed presentation of TR-6 challans. As a result, the appeal was dismissed for lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 29 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3518</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal regarding the demand of interest by the Revenue on delayed payment of duty under Section 47 of the Customs Act. The Court found no legal error in the Tribunal&#039;s ruling, stating that the duty payment was made promptly within two days of assessment, despite the delayed presentation of TR-6 challans. As a result, the appeal was dismissed for lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>