<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 734 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327753</link>
    <description>An ex parte assessment under the Madhya Pradesh Value Added Tax Act could be reopened only on showing sufficient cause for non-appearance, and the record showed repeated opportunities had been given without material proving that cause. The Court nevertheless considered that conditional relief could be granted in the interests of justice, particularly having regard to the tax burden, and interfered with the rejection order. The application was directed to be reconsidered afresh subject to deposit of part of the disputed amount and production of supporting material, so the petitioners obtained only conditional relief and fresh decision on compliance with the imposed terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 21:46:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 734 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327753</link>
      <description>An ex parte assessment under the Madhya Pradesh Value Added Tax Act could be reopened only on showing sufficient cause for non-appearance, and the record showed repeated opportunities had been given without material proving that cause. The Court nevertheless considered that conditional relief could be granted in the interests of justice, particularly having regard to the tax burden, and interfered with the rejection order. The application was directed to be reconsidered afresh subject to deposit of part of the disputed amount and production of supporting material, so the petitioners obtained only conditional relief and fresh decision on compliance with the imposed terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>