<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 732 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327751</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the winding-up petition, as the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case for winding up the respondent company based on the disputed outstanding amount. The judgment emphasized caution in handling such petitions to prevent misuse and protect the interests of creditors and the public.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 21:44:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 732 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327751</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the winding-up petition, as the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case for winding up the respondent company based on the disputed outstanding amount. The judgment emphasized caution in handling such petitions to prevent misuse and protect the interests of creditors and the public.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>