https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182742 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's judgment, and dismissed the plaintiff's suit. The termination of the respondent's service was deemed lawful as it did not violate rules under Article 309, and the protections of Article 311 were held not applicable to the respondent's defense-related post. The appellants were directed to bear costs for both sides. en-us Fri, 30 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 May 2016 18:32:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182742 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's judgment, and dismissed the plaintiff's suit. The termination of the respondent's service was deemed lawful as it did not violate rules under Article 309, and the protections of Article 311 were held not applicable to the respondent's defense-related post. The appellants were directed to bear costs for both sides. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182742