<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1927 (7) TMI 2 - Privy Council</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182729</link>
    <description>The right of appeal from a High Court judgment on a reference under the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 was confined to cases certified as fit for appeal under Section 109(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure; it did not extend to cases within Section 110, because Section 66A(2) used the same limiting language and Section 66A(3) did not widen the class of appealable cases. Section 66A also did not operate retrospectively to create a statutory appeal from High Court orders made before its commencement, as the provision contained no express words or necessary intendment and was framed for operation after coming into force. The petitions therefore failed for want of a statutory right of appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 1927 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 16:51:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1927 (7) TMI 2 - Privy Council</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182729</link>
      <description>The right of appeal from a High Court judgment on a reference under the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 was confined to cases certified as fit for appeal under Section 109(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure; it did not extend to cases within Section 110, because Section 66A(2) used the same limiting language and Section 66A(3) did not widen the class of appealable cases. Section 66A also did not operate retrospectively to create a statutory appeal from High Court orders made before its commencement, as the provision contained no express words or necessary intendment and was framed for operation after coming into force. The petitions therefore failed for want of a statutory right of appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 1927 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>