<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1654 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182722</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) regarding the treatment of income from share transactions. The Court found no error in treating the income as long term capital gain instead of business income, as the shares had been previously treated as investments in earlier assessments. As no substantial question of law arose, the Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1654 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182722</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) regarding the treatment of income from share transactions. The Court found no error in treating the income as long term capital gain instead of business income, as the shares had been previously treated as investments in earlier assessments. As no substantial question of law arose, the Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>