<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1098 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182719</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the matter back to the Assessing Officer for verification regarding the difference in figures due to reimbursement of expenses and the possibility of TDS deduction from reimbursement payments. The ad hoc disallowance of 2% on expenses was confirmed due to incomplete expense details.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 14:23:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1098 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182719</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the matter back to the Assessing Officer for verification regarding the difference in figures due to reimbursement of expenses and the possibility of TDS deduction from reimbursement payments. The ad hoc disallowance of 2% on expenses was confirmed due to incomplete expense details.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>