<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 149 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3508</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the restoration applications as the Supreme Court decision cited by the appellants was not raised during the original appeal hearings, and the Member found no error in the Tribunal&#039;s order based on the differing provisions of the Central Excise Act and Service tax laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 149 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3508</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the restoration applications as the Supreme Court decision cited by the appellants was not raised during the original appeal hearings, and the Member found no error in the Tribunal&#039;s order based on the differing provisions of the Central Excise Act and Service tax laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>