<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 579 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182712</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellants were not entitled to additional Floor Space Index (FSI) or Transferable Development Rights (TDR) under the 1991 Regulations. The Court held that the Scheme Regulations prevailed over the 1991 Regulations, emphasizing that the final Scheme and statutory provisions took precedence over conflicting regulations or directives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 12:06:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 579 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182712</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellants were not entitled to additional Floor Space Index (FSI) or Transferable Development Rights (TDR) under the 1991 Regulations. The Court held that the Scheme Regulations prevailed over the 1991 Regulations, emphasizing that the final Scheme and statutory provisions took precedence over conflicting regulations or directives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>