<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 579 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182712</link>
    <description>A finally sanctioned town planning scheme with statutory finality prevails over the general development control regulations. Where the scheme regulations and special provisions do not provide for transfer of development rights or additional FSI in lieu of compensation, those benefits cannot be claimed under general enabling provisions. State directions, correspondence, or a pending application do not create an enforceable right when they are conditional or not communicated as a binding decision. The legal position is that the scheme, once sanctioned, binds the parties, and any claim for additional development benefit must arise expressly from the scheme or the statute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 12:06:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 579 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182712</link>
      <description>A finally sanctioned town planning scheme with statutory finality prevails over the general development control regulations. Where the scheme regulations and special provisions do not provide for transfer of development rights or additional FSI in lieu of compensation, those benefits cannot be claimed under general enabling provisions. State directions, correspondence, or a pending application do not create an enforceable right when they are conditional or not communicated as a binding decision. The legal position is that the scheme, once sanctioned, binds the parties, and any claim for additional development benefit must arise expressly from the scheme or the statute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>