https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182708 The Supreme Court dismissed the petition for special leave based on the precedent set in Jai Singh Murari v. Sovani (P) Ltd., stating that the transfer of a tenancy after it ceases to be contractual is impermissible under the Bombay Rent Act. The dissenting note in Damadilal v. Parashram was not considered as it did not relate to the Bombay Act, making the decision in Jai Singh's case binding. en-us Mon, 10 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 May 2016 10:51:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182708 The Supreme Court dismissed the petition for special leave based on the precedent set in Jai Singh Murari v. Sovani (P) Ltd., stating that the transfer of a tenancy after it ceases to be contractual is impermissible under the Bombay Rent Act. The dissenting note in Damadilal v. Parashram was not considered as it did not relate to the Bombay Act, making the decision in Jai Singh's case binding. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182708