<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 725 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182705</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court quashed the order of detention under COFEPOSA due to a significant delay of almost 3 1/2 months in execution. The Court found the State&#039;s explanation for the delay vague and lacking specific details of efforts made to execute the order. It noted the absence of actions like canceling bail or preventing the petitioner&#039;s exemption from personal appearance during the delay, indicating a lack of serious efforts by the authorities. Consequently, the Court concluded that the respondents failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay, leading to the order&#039;s quashing and the petitioner&#039;s release.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 09:52:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 725 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182705</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court quashed the order of detention under COFEPOSA due to a significant delay of almost 3 1/2 months in execution. The Court found the State&#039;s explanation for the delay vague and lacking specific details of efforts made to execute the order. It noted the absence of actions like canceling bail or preventing the petitioner&#039;s exemption from personal appearance during the delay, indicating a lack of serious efforts by the authorities. Consequently, the Court concluded that the respondents failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay, leading to the order&#039;s quashing and the petitioner&#039;s release.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>