<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 727 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327746</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, overturning the decisions of the CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal. It held that the Assessing Officer was justified in considering the notebook KPS-5 and Bank Passbook for the block assessment. The deletion of the addition of Rs. 1,59,40,263/- by the Tribunal was deemed legally unsustainable. The Court emphasized that the documents were under the control of the assessee and had been relied upon by the assessee in his block return, thus supporting their admissibility in the assessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 18:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 727 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327746</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, overturning the decisions of the CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal. It held that the Assessing Officer was justified in considering the notebook KPS-5 and Bank Passbook for the block assessment. The deletion of the addition of Rs. 1,59,40,263/- by the Tribunal was deemed legally unsustainable. The Court emphasized that the documents were under the control of the assessee and had been relied upon by the assessee in his block return, thus supporting their admissibility in the assessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>