<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 714 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327733</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the re-determination of the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) under the Cost Plus Method (CPM) for transfer pricing issues. It instructed the AO/TPO to ensure comparables are contract manufacturers with minimal risks. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the capital nature of fixed asset write-offs but allowed adding the amount to the purchase price for depreciation. It approved the provision for obsolete goods but disallowed provisions for doubtful debts and advances due to non-compliance and lack of evidence. The Tribunal deleted the disallowance of 10% capital expenditure on advertisement expenses but remanded the brand building disallowance for further examination by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 08:27:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 714 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327733</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the re-determination of the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) under the Cost Plus Method (CPM) for transfer pricing issues. It instructed the AO/TPO to ensure comparables are contract manufacturers with minimal risks. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the capital nature of fixed asset write-offs but allowed adding the amount to the purchase price for depreciation. It approved the provision for obsolete goods but disallowed provisions for doubtful debts and advances due to non-compliance and lack of evidence. The Tribunal deleted the disallowance of 10% capital expenditure on advertisement expenses but remanded the brand building disallowance for further examination by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>