<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 703 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327722</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming that the aggregate of business loss or depreciation, whichever is lower, should be considered for reduction from the book profit. The appeals of the Revenue were dismissed, and the cross objections of the assessee were also dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 08:26:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 703 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327722</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming that the aggregate of business loss or depreciation, whichever is lower, should be considered for reduction from the book profit. The appeals of the Revenue were dismissed, and the cross objections of the assessee were also dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>