<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 701 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327720</link>
    <description>The penalty order passed by the Assessing Officer was quashed as it was beyond the limitation period prescribed by section 158BFA(3)(e) of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the penalty order was deemed null and void as it was passed without the required approval from the Joint Commissioner, as mandated by section 158BFA(3)(b). Consequently, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, along with the Cross Objection filed by the assessee, with the final order issued on 09-03-2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 08:26:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 701 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327720</link>
      <description>The penalty order passed by the Assessing Officer was quashed as it was beyond the limitation period prescribed by section 158BFA(3)(e) of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the penalty order was deemed null and void as it was passed without the required approval from the Joint Commissioner, as mandated by section 158BFA(3)(b). Consequently, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, along with the Cross Objection filed by the assessee, with the final order issued on 09-03-2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>