<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1097 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182695</link>
    <description>A later import-control notification with a saving clause did not displace the earlier regime for a consignment already imported before the new notification took effect, so the earlier notification and the permit issued under it remained applicable. On the import-compliance issue, a foreign sanitary certificate was not treated as sufficient by itself where compliance with Indian conditions on animal rennet and related requirements remained uncertain. The competent authority could require sampling and testing in India before deciding whether to release the goods. The no objection certificate was therefore not directed to issue outright, but fresh testing and a prompt release decision were permitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1097 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182695</link>
      <description>A later import-control notification with a saving clause did not displace the earlier regime for a consignment already imported before the new notification took effect, so the earlier notification and the permit issued under it remained applicable. On the import-compliance issue, a foreign sanitary certificate was not treated as sufficient by itself where compliance with Indian conditions on animal rennet and related requirements remained uncertain. The competent authority could require sampling and testing in India before deciding whether to release the goods. The no objection certificate was therefore not directed to issue outright, but fresh testing and a prompt release decision were permitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>