https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3499 A revision against refusal of stay in eviction proceedings under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 was not interfered with because the grant of stay is discretionary and revision lies only where that discretion is shown to be illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, or perverse. The petitioner failed to establish any legal infirmity in the lower court's exercise of discretion, particularly where the proceedings had already progressed and possession was stated to have been taken. The interlocutory order refusing stay was therefore sustained, while the main appeal was directed to be disposed of expeditiously on its own merits. en-us Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3499 A revision against refusal of stay in eviction proceedings under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 was not interfered with because the grant of stay is discretionary and revision lies only where that discretion is shown to be illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, or perverse. The petitioner failed to establish any legal infirmity in the lower court's exercise of discretion, particularly where the proceedings had already progressed and possession was stated to have been taken. The interlocutory order refusing stay was therefore sustained, while the main appeal was directed to be disposed of expeditiously on its own merits. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3499