<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1166 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182697</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, allowing input service credit on service tax paid for factory rent. It emphasized the direct relation of the factory to manufacturing activity, citing relevant case law and criticizing Revenue for disregarding this connection. The Tribunal concluded that the rent for the factory premises was integral to the manufacturing process, in line with established principles, and dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 23:08:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1166 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182697</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, allowing input service credit on service tax paid for factory rent. It emphasized the direct relation of the factory to manufacturing activity, citing relevant case law and criticizing Revenue for disregarding this connection. The Tribunal concluded that the rent for the factory premises was integral to the manufacturing process, in line with established principles, and dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>