https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3498 The HC held that a writ petition challenging the AO's exercise of powers beyond the scope of section 264 is maintainable, as there is no bar when jurisdictional error is involved. The court ruled that since the revisional authority's directions to the AO were precise, the AO cannot expand the revisional order by considering new issues not covered in the original directions. en-us Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 22 Jun 2025 10:00:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3498 The HC held that a writ petition challenging the AO's exercise of powers beyond the scope of section 264 is maintainable, as there is no bar when jurisdictional error is involved. The court ruled that since the revisional authority's directions to the AO were precise, the AO cannot expand the revisional order by considering new issues not covered in the original directions. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3498