<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 695 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327714</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the deletion of the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act by the CIT(A) and the Tribunal. The penalty was cancelled based on the inadvertent mistake made by the counsel filing the return, with no intention to conceal income. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had paid tax on the amounts and no one had benefitted from the error. The Court found no error or perversity in the decisions of the lower authorities, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 695 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327714</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the deletion of the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act by the CIT(A) and the Tribunal. The penalty was cancelled based on the inadvertent mistake made by the counsel filing the return, with no intention to conceal income. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had paid tax on the amounts and no one had benefitted from the error. The Court found no error or perversity in the decisions of the lower authorities, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>