<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 689 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327708</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant&#039;s explanations were deemed bona fide, and no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income was found. The Tribunal held that the disallowances were based on differing views and that proper verification was lacking, leading to the invalidity of the penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 22:57:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 689 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327708</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant&#039;s explanations were deemed bona fide, and no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income was found. The Tribunal held that the disallowances were based on differing views and that proper verification was lacking, leading to the invalidity of the penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>