<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 92 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3495</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision to confirm the disallowance of Rs. 1,98,607 for the assessment year 1980-81. The court found that the borrowed money was not diverted to provide interest-free loans, satisfying the conditions of section 36(1)(iii) for full interest deduction on borrowed capital. As a result, the court answered in favor of the assessee against the Revenue, rendering the other issues moot.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 92 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3495</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision to confirm the disallowance of Rs. 1,98,607 for the assessment year 1980-81. The court found that the borrowed money was not diverted to provide interest-free loans, satisfying the conditions of section 36(1)(iii) for full interest deduction on borrowed capital. As a result, the court answered in favor of the assessee against the Revenue, rendering the other issues moot.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>