https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327694 The writ petition challenging a duty demand under the Central Excise Act was deemed not maintainable by the court, directing the petitioner to appeal to the CESTAT. The court refrained from adjudicating on the legality of the impugned order and other issues, instructing the petitioner to raise them before the appellate authority. A pre-deposit of 5% of the duty demand was required for the appeal, with the remaining amount, interest, and penalty in abeyance. The court emphasized the need for the appellate authority to consider all contentions raised by both parties promptly. en-us Mon, 02 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Nov 2016 11:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327694 The writ petition challenging a duty demand under the Central Excise Act was deemed not maintainable by the court, directing the petitioner to appeal to the CESTAT. The court refrained from adjudicating on the legality of the impugned order and other issues, instructing the petitioner to raise them before the appellate authority. A pre-deposit of 5% of the duty demand was required for the appeal, with the remaining amount, interest, and penalty in abeyance. The court emphasized the need for the appellate authority to consider all contentions raised by both parties promptly. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 02 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327694