<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 666 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327685</link>
    <description>A concessional central sales tax notification must be strictly construed, so de-oiled cake could not be treated as oil cake where the notification expressly included only oil cake and treated the two commodities as distinct. The commentary also states that reassessment under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act could not be reopened merely because the authority later changed its view on the same material and C Forms already examined in the original assessment. On that basis, the original assessment benefit was to stand, while the commodity classification distinction was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 666 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327685</link>
      <description>A concessional central sales tax notification must be strictly construed, so de-oiled cake could not be treated as oil cake where the notification expressly included only oil cake and treated the two commodities as distinct. The commentary also states that reassessment under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act could not be reopened merely because the authority later changed its view on the same material and C Forms already examined in the original assessment. On that basis, the original assessment benefit was to stand, while the commodity classification distinction was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>