<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 665 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327684</link>
    <description>The High Court of Allahabad quashed the order suspending the petitioner&#039;s registration under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008, as it was passed without pending cancellation proceedings, contrary to statutory requirements. The court directed a prompt decision on any representation filed by the petitioner concerning the seizure order issued under the Act, emphasizing the availability of statutory remedies for challenging the seizure order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 22:15:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 665 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327684</link>
      <description>The High Court of Allahabad quashed the order suspending the petitioner&#039;s registration under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008, as it was passed without pending cancellation proceedings, contrary to statutory requirements. The court directed a prompt decision on any representation filed by the petitioner concerning the seizure order issued under the Act, emphasizing the availability of statutory remedies for challenging the seizure order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>