<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1147 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182691</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned in the Department&#039;s civil appeals, and the Supreme Court then dismissed the appeals. No substantive legal reasoning on the central excise dispute is recorded in the text, so the operative effect is limited to the disposal of the matters after acceptance of the delay explanation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 18:41:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1147 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182691</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned in the Department&#039;s civil appeals, and the Supreme Court then dismissed the appeals. No substantive legal reasoning on the central excise dispute is recorded in the text, so the operative effect is limited to the disposal of the matters after acceptance of the delay explanation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>