https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182690 The Supreme Court set aside the detention order under the COFEPOSA Act due to its futility as the appellant had not engaged in similar activities since the order in 2002. The Settlement Commission granted immunity with conditions and imposed a penalty, later revoked by the High Court. The High Court dismissed the challenge to the detention order as premature, leading to the Supreme Court overturning this decision. The judgment highlighted the potential for future detention orders if similar allegations arise against the appellant. en-us Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Aug 2017 13:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182690 The Supreme Court set aside the detention order under the COFEPOSA Act due to its futility as the appellant had not engaged in similar activities since the order in 2002. The Settlement Commission granted immunity with conditions and imposed a penalty, later revoked by the High Court. The High Court dismissed the challenge to the detention order as premature, leading to the Supreme Court overturning this decision. The judgment highlighted the potential for future detention orders if similar allegations arise against the appellant. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182690