<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 922 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182688</link>
    <description>The High Court found in favor of the petitioners, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matter to the Tribunal for rehearing. The Court emphasized the need to consider financial hardship in the context of the economy and market liquidity to prevent adverse effects on production and employment. The petitioners established a prima facie case, and the issue of hardship requires further examination. Respondents were directed not to recover the disputed amount during the appeal&#039;s pendency before the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 18:06:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 922 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182688</link>
      <description>The High Court found in favor of the petitioners, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matter to the Tribunal for rehearing. The Court emphasized the need to consider financial hardship in the context of the economy and market liquidity to prevent adverse effects on production and employment. The petitioners established a prima facie case, and the issue of hardship requires further examination. Respondents were directed not to recover the disputed amount during the appeal&#039;s pendency before the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>