<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 145 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3491</link>
    <description>The Court held that the amendment to Section 43B by the Finance Act 2003 was prospective, not retrospective, and applicable from the assessment year 2004-2005. The substantial question of law was answered in favor of the Revenue and against the Assessee, emphasizing the intention to simplify tax administration and the explicit effective date of April 1, 2004 for the amendment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 145 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3491</link>
      <description>The Court held that the amendment to Section 43B by the Finance Act 2003 was prospective, not retrospective, and applicable from the assessment year 2004-2005. The substantial question of law was answered in favor of the Revenue and against the Assessee, emphasizing the intention to simplify tax administration and the explicit effective date of April 1, 2004 for the amendment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>