<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 959 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182677</link>
    <description>Revisional jurisdiction under Section 10-B of the Sales Tax Act may be used to correct an illegal or improper assessment where the relevant turnover was already on the assessment record, even if that turnover could also fall within escaped-assessment provisions under Section 21. Section 21 remains the specific reassessment mechanism for escaped or under-assessed turnover, but its existence does not bar revision in these circumstances. The revisional power is supervisory in nature and cannot be founded on fresh material discovered after assessment. On the facts, the turnover had been overlooked from the existing file, so the revisional authority acted within jurisdiction and the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 14:29:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 959 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182677</link>
      <description>Revisional jurisdiction under Section 10-B of the Sales Tax Act may be used to correct an illegal or improper assessment where the relevant turnover was already on the assessment record, even if that turnover could also fall within escaped-assessment provisions under Section 21. Section 21 remains the specific reassessment mechanism for escaped or under-assessed turnover, but its existence does not bar revision in these circumstances. The revisional power is supervisory in nature and cannot be founded on fresh material discovered after assessment. On the facts, the turnover had been overlooked from the existing file, so the revisional authority acted within jurisdiction and the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>