<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 859 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182670</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the appeal challenging the disallowance of interest under Section 80M of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1992-93. The ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance was upheld as it found no nexus between borrowed funds and investments, with the assessee having adequate funds for investments. The Court concluded that no substantial question of law emerged from the case, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 11:04:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 859 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182670</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the appeal challenging the disallowance of interest under Section 80M of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1992-93. The ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance was upheld as it found no nexus between borrowed funds and investments, with the assessee having adequate funds for investments. The Court concluded that no substantial question of law emerged from the case, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>