https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182668 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by deleting the additions on account of alleged job work due to lack of corroborative evidence. However, the additions related to household expenses, unexplained self-assessment tax, difference in cost of construction, and disallowance of deduction u/s 54 were upheld based on the evidence presented, with the Tribunal finding the CIT(A)'s decisions fair and reasonable. en-us Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 May 2016 10:38:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182668 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by deleting the additions on account of alleged job work due to lack of corroborative evidence. However, the additions related to household expenses, unexplained self-assessment tax, difference in cost of construction, and disallowance of deduction u/s 54 were upheld based on the evidence presented, with the Tribunal finding the CIT(A)'s decisions fair and reasonable. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182668