<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 158 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3488</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, a Partnership Firm in the Real Estate business, regarding the treatment of interest earned prior to the commencement of business. The Tribunal ruled that interest earned before business commencement should not be considered income from other sources, citing established legal principles from Supreme Court judgments. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as it failed to provide sufficient evidence or challenge the Tribunal&#039;s decision effectively. The Court found no substantial question of law to consider, resulting in the closure of the case without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 158 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3488</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, a Partnership Firm in the Real Estate business, regarding the treatment of interest earned prior to the commencement of business. The Tribunal ruled that interest earned before business commencement should not be considered income from other sources, citing established legal principles from Supreme Court judgments. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as it failed to provide sufficient evidence or challenge the Tribunal&#039;s decision effectively. The Court found no substantial question of law to consider, resulting in the closure of the case without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>