<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1184 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182660</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of bad debts and partially on the disallowance under Section 14A, sending some issues back to the AO for review. The claim for depreciation and deduction for foreseeable losses were also remitted for reconsideration. The deduction of retention money was upheld for the assessee. The AO&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were partially allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1184 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182660</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of bad debts and partially on the disallowance under Section 14A, sending some issues back to the AO for review. The claim for depreciation and deduction for foreseeable losses were also remitted for reconsideration. The deduction of retention money was upheld for the assessee. The AO&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were partially allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>