<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 389 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182656</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Designated Court&#039;s bail order granted to the respondent due to errors in considering the late filing of the police report and miscalculating the one-year period. The Court emphasized that bail eligibility should be based on the case&#039;s merits post challan filing. The respondent was directed to surrender and seek bail according to statutory provisions, leading to the cancellation of the bail granted by the Designated Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 18:24:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 389 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182656</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Designated Court&#039;s bail order granted to the respondent due to errors in considering the late filing of the police report and miscalculating the one-year period. The Court emphasized that bail eligibility should be based on the case&#039;s merits post challan filing. The respondent was directed to surrender and seek bail according to statutory provisions, leading to the cancellation of the bail granted by the Designated Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>