<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 270 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182654</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Magistrate&#039;s order issuing process against the accused for the murders of Aarushi Talwar and Hemraj, finding sufficient grounds for proceeding. The High Court&#039;s dismissal of the revision petition was deemed valid, with the Supreme Court emphasizing the Magistrate&#039;s well-founded decision. Defenses raised by the accused were considered factual and to be substantiated during trial. The request for further investigation was denied, and the filing of the review petition was criticized as misuse of jurisdiction, leading to its dismissal. The Supreme Court directed the trial to proceed without influence from prior court observations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 18:17:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 270 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182654</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Magistrate&#039;s order issuing process against the accused for the murders of Aarushi Talwar and Hemraj, finding sufficient grounds for proceeding. The High Court&#039;s dismissal of the revision petition was deemed valid, with the Supreme Court emphasizing the Magistrate&#039;s well-founded decision. Defenses raised by the accused were considered factual and to be substantiated during trial. The request for further investigation was denied, and the filing of the review petition was criticized as misuse of jurisdiction, leading to its dismissal. The Supreme Court directed the trial to proceed without influence from prior court observations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>