https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182652 No reliable material supported the claim that the appellant was arrested on 10 October 2008; the record instead showed interrogation, travel, hospitalisation, and formal arrest on 23 October 2008. On that factual basis, no violation of Article 22(2) was established because custody following production before the Magistrate and remand to judicial custody was pursuant to judicial order. For default bail, the relevant period under Section 167(2) runs from the first remand order, not from the date of arrest. As the charge-sheet was filed within 90 days from the first remand, no right to default bail survived. en-us Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Oct 2017 09:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182652 No reliable material supported the claim that the appellant was arrested on 10 October 2008; the record instead showed interrogation, travel, hospitalisation, and formal arrest on 23 October 2008. On that factual basis, no violation of Article 22(2) was established because custody following production before the Magistrate and remand to judicial custody was pursuant to judicial order. For default bail, the relevant period under Section 167(2) runs from the first remand order, not from the date of arrest. As the charge-sheet was filed within 90 days from the first remand, no right to default bail survived. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182652