<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 618 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182651</link>
    <description>Cutting, punching, drilling, straightening, notching and bending of duty-paid angles, channels and plates used for transmission towers and sub-station structures did not amount to manufacture, because the operations merely prepared components for site assembly and did not bring into existence a new product. Following earlier Tribunal rulings on similar processes, the resultant components were therefore not excisable goods under Tariff Item 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 17:23:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 618 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182651</link>
      <description>Cutting, punching, drilling, straightening, notching and bending of duty-paid angles, channels and plates used for transmission towers and sub-station structures did not amount to manufacture, because the operations merely prepared components for site assembly and did not bring into existence a new product. Following earlier Tribunal rulings on similar processes, the resultant components were therefore not excisable goods under Tariff Item 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>